• Search Blog Archives

Follow us: 
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Visit us on YouTube Follow us on LinkedIn

July 2011 Posts

Websense Researchers at Black Hat USA 2011
Posted: 29 Jul 2011 09:36 AM

 

This week, some of the members of the Websense Security Labs™ will be attending Black Hat USA 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Blackhat is arguably the largest and most important Internet security conference in the world.

 

Armin Beuscher and I (Stephan Chenette) will be in the Black Hat Arsenal demo area demonstrating two open source tools we've released to the public. Check out the video for more information, and see the schedule below for demo times.

 

 

(Problems viewing this video? Click here)

 

Armin Buescher will be demoing ReplayProxy on Wednesday from 11:15AM - 3:00PM 
Stephan Chenette will be demoing Fireshark on Wednesday from 1:45PM - 6:00PM

 

(Figure 1: Black Hat USA 2011 Day 1 schedule)


The following researchers will be attending Black Hat, so if you see us, be sure to stop by and talk. We're there to see interesting research presentations, but mainly we want to interact with our research colleagues, friends, and customers, and to meet new researchers.

 
Patrik Runald, Senior Manager, Security Research


Stephan Chenette, Principal Security Researcher


Ali Mesdaq, Senior Security Researcher


Armin Buescher, Security Researcher


We'll be tweeting from the conference so make sure to follow us at websenselabs!

 

Filed under:

Anonymous

Hands-on Training with the Security Labs
Posted: 28 Jul 2011 08:00 AM

Websense Security Labs™ just completed a two-day training event with some of our TRITON™ advisory board customers. We showed attendees some of the internal and external tools we use to analyze various Web threats, including PDF, JAR, and SWF exploits.  We also showed attendees how to deobfuscate Web exploits that had been encoded so that they could determine what exploit was on the page. Our two-day training consisted of both analysis training and insight into how we use machine learning to detect and prevent malicious obfuscation and iframe/script injected content, as well as for general categorization purposes. 

 

(Problems viewing this video? Click here)

 

If you are a Websense customer, affiliate, or partner and want to take part in our next TRITON advistory board Websense Labs Training event, contact your sales person.

Filed under:

Anonymous

Has my credit card really been blocked?
Posted: 28 Jul 2011 02:18 PM

Websense ThreatSeeker® Network has been monitoring and tracking a recent wave of email attacks being spread and aimed at credit card users and holders. 

 

The attack comes in the form of a short email with fairly detailed text alerting the recipient that their credit card has been blocked, and that they should open the attached file to find out more.  The format seems old, with the content and attached file properties being the distinctive factor.  With the recent attacks and data breaches of organizations in the press, this seems to be worth the buzz as personal details and credit card details were part of the information leaked.

 

Sample of email message.

 

A similar message opened with a text editor below shows the content has not changed that much during the campaign less the wording within the message body and header information with regards to sender address or connecting IP's which are listed in this blog post..  

 

 

A noticeable repeating pattern, besides the salutation and some generic content such as ” Dear User|Client|Sir|Madam”, “WARNING|ATTENTION|URGENT”, is the attached file name.  This example file format is a .bat file, which indicates it is a DOS executable batch file.  Additionally, the file name format we have seen has always used the following format:

 

 "id", "[5-7 digits]" and the file extention.

 

Further analysis into the file reveals this is also a Windows executable that contains a PE tag within the header information, as highlighted in the picture below.

 

 

Interestingly, the file properties also suggest to the untrained eye that this appears to have been originated from VMware.  This ties in to the entire trickery of the author and also the re-use of the tactic and resources.

 

 

Although this appears to have originated from VMware, the attached file is actually not signed, as shown in the screen shot below (courtesy of VirusTotal).

 

 

The file is also VM-Aware, as the resulting execution of a download for fake AV only works if host based analysis is used (as opposed to a guest virtual machine).

Websense customers are protected from these threats by ACE, our Advanced Classification Engine.

 

Anonymous

Sophisticated injection abuses the Twitter trend service
Posted: 27 Jul 2011 08:41 AM

About three years ago code injection was very simple, where most of them were just an iFrame tag. Hackers then started to insert a piece of script code to obfuscate the malicious code, yet the goal still remains the same – to insert an iFrame tag or script tag to redirect vistors to another site. Recently, the Websense ThreatSeeker® Network has detected a mass injection campaign that has infected more than 10,000 Web sites.

What is surprising is the size of injected code; it’s very big – over 6,000 kbs. Surely such a large injection code can contain a lot of malicious content.  The attacker used 5 layers of obfuscated methods to conceal the final redirect code. The redirect target is determined based on Twitter trend services (abused Twitter trend service is not new. We have posted about this in the past). The redirect target is  different every day, and even different at day and at night!



Above is a part of the injection code, which is usually placed at the end of a normal page. With our Javascirpt de-obfuscated tool, we were redirected to the page below.

 

 

The redirect code will query Twitter trend services and gets the trend data within 2 or 3 days. Using popular words at 7:00 or 18:00 in the trend data as a key, and after some complicated mathematical computation, a final redirect URL is generated and then inserted in the iFrame tag.

 

 

The code will compute 2 redirect URLs everyday, according to the time you visited the infected website. One URL is for the time between 05:00 - 16:00; the other URL is for the remaining time.  Here are the redirect URLs used in July

 

20110701-------------http://dbcuqdpdfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110701-------------http://xderummxfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110702-------------http://gbcpgjkgfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110702-------------http://wiadwlxwfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110703-------------http://gabeevygfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110703-------------http://sabiofesfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110704-------------http://aghpgwkafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110704-------------http://efgeenyefds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110705-------------http://niadwixnfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110705-------------http://rdehaccrfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110706-------------http://mefjhddmfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110706-------------http://ghjvxdqgfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110707-------------http://wghabguwfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110707-------------http://viascznvfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110708-------------http://aianrgjafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110708-------------http://ajiwferafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110709-------------http://aghflzaafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110709-------------http://ahjvxqqafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110710-------------http://qcdbjuvqfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110710-------------http://kiascenkfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110711-------------http://tbcfleatfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110711-------------http://mcdqnmlmfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110712-------------http://miasclnmfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110712-------------http://mhjldbgmfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110713-------------http://tfgeexytfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110713-------------http://cjirubmcfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110714-------------http://wfgytetwfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110714-------------http://uefjhrdufds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110715-------------http://gjiruxmgfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110715-------------http://scdqnklsfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110716-------------http://aaboywiafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110716-------------http://ajicpzwafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110717-------------http://uefxmgsufds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110717-------------http://oefjhudofds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110718-------------http://aefxmusafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110718-------------http://aghabguafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110719-------------http://pianrejpfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110719-------------http://aabioqeafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110720-------------http://uhjgswbufds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110720-------------http://jcdgsdbjfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110721-------------http://scdldsgsfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110721-------------http://gefscrngfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110722-------------http://mghuqcpmfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110722-------------http://ghjqndlgfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110723-------------http://fbcabkuffds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110723-------------http://lfgythtlfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110724-------------http://ajicpfwafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110724-------------http://ajicpcwafds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110725-------------http://vianrhjvfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d
20110725-------------http://kefnrkjkfds.com/index.php?tp=001e4bb7b4d7333d


The URL redirects customers to the Blackhole Exploit Kit where a rogue AV application will be installed. Below are IP addresses that host the Blackhole Exploit Kit.


46.165.192.232
46.20.119.80
66.135.59.143
216.155.147.12
64.150.187.129
200.35.147.150
108.59.2.202


The good news is that Websense Security Labs continue to track different types of exploit kits (including Blackhole), and customers are protected against these kind of campaigns.

 

uwang

Online shops and robots.txt help to leak personal data
Posted: 26 Jul 2011 01:38 PM

Two major data leaks occurred in Russia over the past several days.  Short Message Service (SMS) text messages and personal Information about people who ordered goods from Russian and Ukranian online shops (including sex shops) have been available for public viewing.  Last week approximately 8000 private SMS messages sent from the Russian mobile network online service MegaFon were indexed by search engines.  

The reasons for this breach? Human error. The robots.txt file was removed by mistake, and a search engine browser plug-in called Yandex.Bar, equivalent to the Google toolbar, sent individual page URLs to the search engine for indexing.

This is an example of poor site design combined with bad luck. Sites should not display pages that contain SMS details to a client other than the sender (by using cookies, for example).  In this case, site designers assumed that a unique URL was enough for security.  They were wrong. The search engine's browser plug-in transferred each unique URL directly to the search engine, and because they had removed robots.txt, the only blocking entity, the result was a flood of personal data.

 

Today we see another leak of personal information about online shoppers listed in Yandex, Google, and other major search engine's results.

 

 

In today's case, robots.txt was again a problem, this time because the file was present but incorrectly configured. The file did not include instructions not to index pages with personal data. Publicly leaked information consists of buyers' names, product prices, IP-addresses, and buyers' home/delivery addresses. 

 

 

According to Digit.ru, a company called webAsyst developed the software for creating the online shops. Company representatives explained that after a buyer purchases a product from an online shop, the shop sends a link with purchase status to the buyer via email to a web site that is not password protected. So those pages where indexed by search engines.

 

As a result of this leak, the Russian search engine Yandex has asked web site administrators to review information about robots.txt files and how to use them, so this type of incident does not happen in the future. Leaked information was still visible at the time of writing this blog.

 

Websense recommends protecting private customer data by encrypting it or password protecting any web site that contains personal data so search engine robots cannot index the information.

 

Thanks to Petr Savich for help in writing this blog.

Filed under: ,

Artem Gololobov

Facebook scams aiming to profit from recent tragedies in Norway and Amy Winehouse's death
Posted: 25 Jul 2011 10:36 AM

The tragic events that occurred at the end of last week with the Norway attacks and the sudden death of British singer Amy Winehouse resulted in some unwanted scam activities in cyberspace. Websense Security Labs and the Websense ThreatSeeker® Network have detected that scams pretending to offer a "look at footage of Amy Winehouse just moments after her death" and similar scams in nature are now propagating in Facebook. This type of scam is a "survey scam," where users are lured to complete a survey and in return, are promised to be shown an "exclusive" video or footage. Completion of the surveys puts some money in the scammer's pockets, and users that complete the surveys are never shown the promised videos or footage.

 

This is how this scam looks on Facebook:

 

 

 

 

The scam leads to a survey page:

 

 

Scams taking advantage of the tragic Norway attacks surfaced this weekend, but these scams appear to have been cleaned out by Facebook:

 

 

Facebook Scams - an Ongoing Phenomenon

 

Survey scams on Facebook are an ongoing thing. They're not limited to one news event alone (tragic or not) or one domain. They keep track of current news events and aim to lure Facebook users with any means possible. Here is a snapshot of some domains affected by these scams, which were propagating via Facebook at the time this blog was being written. They pop up like mushrooms after the rain and share similarities, such as lures that seem to use the same toolkit or application skeleton  to build them all. This is a similar phenomenon to what we blogged on in the past. Anybody can get his or her hands on those "template" applications and create Facebook threats in minutes. Here are some examples of threats dominating Facebook at the moment that are using the same skeleton or toolkit mentioned earlier: 

 

 

Scam: "This Is What Happens When Ex Girlfriend Forgets To Turn Off Her Webcam!!!"

 

Scam [translated from Italian] : "Boy Betrays His Girlfriend and Accidently Puts the Video on Facebook" [Ragazzo tradisce la propria ragazza con una Mora da paura e mette per sbaglio il video su FACEBOOK. ASSOLUTAMENTE DA VEDERE"] 

 

Scam: "R4p3d g1rl 1n th3 sch00l bathroom - Sh0cking Video"

 

Scam: "FATHER gets TOTALLY Embarrassed after entering Daughters Room"

 

Scam: "Look what he did to his Ex Girlfriend!"


 

Scam Threats on Facebook Spread Swiftly

All the threats illustrated above are happening on Facebook NOW  at the time this was being written. The next image is an example that shows how many users are actually falling for the ""Look what he did to his Ex Girlfriend!"" scam. The propagation of the threats mentioned above onto user's home pages is happening literally at every given single second or less for all the threats mentioned combined:


 

ThreatSeeker Network on the Prowl

This is a snapshot from our internal ThreatSeeker Network portal showing a slice of the hostnames that the network detected that matches the above profile. Websense customers are protected from these threats by ACE, our Advanced Classification Engine.

 

The Threats Locations - a Geographical Breakdown

 

The different threats that we covered in this blog have a location and you might wonder where that is. The locations aren't limited to one country but several, the next pie chart shows the location breakdown of all the scams we mentioned earlier. Remember, all the mentioned scams have commonalities and use the same toolkit or skeleton to create the viral pages - the locations vary because there are a number of cyber criminals creating different viral pages that are based of the same toolkit/skeleton (click on pie chart image to enlarge):

 

Top Hosting Countries:

United States 

Netherlands

Canada

 

 

 

 

Elad Sharf

David Beckham's Web site hacked
Posted: 11 Jul 2011 05:50 AM

David Beckham's family had a baby girl this weekend, the fourth child in their family. CONGRATULATIONS!  Being a very famous football player, Beckham's Web site has been visited by lots of fans and has a relatively high Alexa rank, especially after this weekend:

 

 

There are bad fans as well: as of today, we have seen that the official David Beckham Web site has been hacked:

 

 

Although the Web site just provides a picture of a dog and a phrase "ScooterDaShooter = FAIL", this does not actually contain any malicious content.

 

 

At the time of writing this blog,  the site was not reachable and there was just a blank page provided for visitors.

 

 

Celebrities' Web sites are always a popular target for hacker attacks, due to amount of visitors to those sites.  In this case the attack was only done to "pass on a message" from a cyber criminal;  in other cases such attacks could lead to posting malicious iframes or any type of bad content for financial gain.

 

At Websense we keep monitoring such sites and consider them potentially dangerous, as malicious content might be inserted in place of a picture.

 

Update:

At the time of releasing this blog,  the site has been fixed and the picture of the dog removed.  Instead, we can see David Beckham sitting in front of his laptop.  Hmm, guess who fixed the site?

 

Filed under:

Artem Gololobov

Does Mac OS X Need Protection?
Posted: 07 Jul 2011 03:00 PM



Over the last couple of months, the concern of whether Mac OS X has become a greater target for attackers has grown, and rightfully so. The Mac OS X market share has steadily increased, and is currently well above 10 percent.

 

From the attackers standpoint, what it always comes down to is dollars. At a certain point, if the user-base becomes large enough, then the profit margin to target and exploit these users becomes reasonable for attackers to invest in. Thus, tools, frameworks, and infrastructure are created and in many cases, much of what has already been built for the Windows platform can be reused. Only the malware and exploits have to change to target specific features of the Mac OS X operating system. This is because malware and exploits created for Windows operating systems will not work for Mac OS X.

 

The fact that Mac OS X hasn't been a major target up until only recently has given many users a false sense of security. It's not uncommon to hear rants from a Mac owner of the inherent security of their invulnerable Mac OS X. The truth is that Macs are as vulnerable as Windows, they just don't have the long running history of gaining the focus and attention of both blackhat and whitehat vulnerability researchers and malware authors. I might even go as far as to say Macs are more vulnerable than Windows, because Microsoft has been in the security game longer than Apple and has a very well-established product development life cycle where security testing plays a very large part in the testing process.

 

Mac OS X Vulnerabilities and Active Exploitation


There were only 34 vulnerabilities identified for the Mac in 2009; in 2010, that number rose to 175. This last month (June 2011), Apple released Java for Mac OS X 10.5 Update 10 and Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 5 to address multiple vulnerabilities. Apple also released Mac OS X 10.6.8 and Security Update 2011-004 to address multiple vulnerabilities. Many of these vulnerabilities allow for remote code execution. The numerous security updates indicate that the days of vulnerability researchers not paying attention to Macs is coming to an end. It's also interesting to note that in this year's CanSecWest's Pwn2Own contest, a fully patched Mac OS X 10.6.6 computer running Safari 5.0.3 was 0wned in less than 5 seconds.


DIY Crimeware Kits


You've probably heard of a few Do-It-Yourself (DIY) crimeware kits for Windows, such as Zeus and SpyEye. DIY crimeware kits are progams that can automatically create malware. Up until now we've only seen crimeware kits that build Windows malware, but this year the Danish IT security company, CSIS Security Group, blogged about Weyland-Yutani BOT, a DIY crimeware kit designed for PCs that is able to target the Mac OS X platform. The builder component of the kit runs on Windows machines and the user has the option of specifying whether they want the resulting malware to run on Mac OS X. The builder will then create a Mac OS X binary.

 
(Figure 1:  
 Weyland-Yutani BOT admin interface)


The Weyland-Yutani BOT DIY crimeware kit and it's ability to create Mac OS X malware is a first of it's kind and could mean we'll be seeing more auto-created Mac OS X malware in the future.

 

Mac OS X Malware

 

More and more malware is turning up targeting Mac OS X.  On average, about 5,000 new pieces of Mac OS X malware are received by security companies a day. This is still quite small compared to the 70,000 pieces of malware received targeting the Windows platform. We believe this number will increase by next year, due to the Mac OS X market share growing and the increase in underground interest in Mac OS X malware creation.

 

Mac OS X Rogue Antivirus

 

Rogue Antivirus is and has been a hugely successful technique by attackers to scare users into thinking they have been infected, when in reality they haven't been, and downloading what they think is antivirus software, paying for it, and installing it on their machine. The end result is that a user pays the attacker directly for installing fake software. This typically happens when a user goes to a legitimate site, which has been compromised and a window that looks much like the Windows Explorer window or desktop window pops up indicating that the machine has been infected:


(Figure 2: Windows Rogue Antivirus pop-up window)

 

In reality, the above screen is actually not Windows Explorer, it's a web page that's been created to look exactly like Windows Explorer, in order to scare you into thinking your operating system is telling you that your machine has been infected. By clicking through and continuing, you're then prompted with an option to download and install antivirus software that will remove all the infections. Once you download it and start the installation process, you're asked to pay for it. At this point, if you decide to pay for it, the attackers have accomplished their goal, they've tricked you into paying them directly for fake software; the software doesn't need to steal, or hide itself, it's done its job.

 

Attackers running these scams have the ability on a website to check what operating system you've had, and up until only recently tricked Windows users, since the graphics on these pages have been crafted to look like the Windows desktop. But attackers have started to target Mac users, and in the last few months, the same websites that used to only trick Windows users, have been tricking Mac OS X users. They started with poisoning Google Search Images to lead to rogue antivirus and then facebook viral scams. The screen will typically look like this for Mac OS X users:


(Figure 3: Mac OS X Rogue Antivirus pop-up window)

 

The screen above looks much like the Mac OS X Finder, the built-in file explorer, and if a user downloads and starts the install process, they, too, are promoted to pay a standard license fee to clean what they assume is an infected machine. The variants that have emerged are Mac Defender, Mac Protector, and Mac Security: 


(Figure 4: Mac Defender admin interface)


(Figure 5: Mac Protector admin interface)


(Figure 6: Mac Security admin interface)

 

All of these rogue antivirus variants accomplish the same thing: they trick the user into paying for security issues they never had. After installing, they each do slightly differently things, but the goals are all the same: pay the attackers.

 

Conclusion

 


So, yes, Mac OS X needs protection, at the moment mainly from its own users. Exploitation is still fairly minimal and common sense should help users avoid being socially engineered (tricked), into downloading, installing, and ultimately willingly handing over their credit card details and payment to the bad guys. 


Websense Security Labs is dedicated to keeping up with the latest emerging threats, be it for Windows, Macs, or any operating system. Our concern is the safety of our users. We continually deploy protection measures into ACE, our Advanced Classification Engine, to detect and block all web content that serves exploits and malware, regardless of what operating system it targets.

 

To protect yourself as a home user, try to follow the following best practices to protect yourself online:

 

  • Do not download or open files from untrusted websites 
  • Do not click on links from unknown or untrusted web sites or suspicious links from trusted sources
  • Do not open e-mail attachments from unknown users or suspicious emails from trusted sources
  • Apply appropriate patches to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing
  • Educate yourself on common threats so as to recognize them and avoid being tricked into falling victim to them

 


Please leave feedback or comments, so we can make sure to fully address any questions or concerns you have about Mac OS X security threats.

Thanks!

Stephan Chenette - Principal Security Researcher

Filed under: ,

Anonymous

Jailbreakme.com 3 and security implications
Posted: 07 Jul 2011 10:29 AM

Jailbreakme.com version 3 went public yesterday and offers, again, a simple way to jailbreak an iOS device. And it's very, very simple. In fact, in our testing the jailbreak doesn't take more than 20 seconds from start to finish and works flawlessly. It doesn't crash your browser, and it even looks and feels like a regular App Store installation. Very slick but also very dangerous.

 

 

The reason it's dangerous is that it works like a drive-by download (but requires user interaction), similar to the ones we see used attacking Windows PCs every day through vulnerabilities and exploit kits. What happens when you click on "Free" -> "Install" on the jailbreakme.com website is that your browser downloads a PDF file that triggers a vulnerability in how the built-in PDF reader handles a certain Font type which in turn installs the actual jailbreak.

 

This isn't the first time we've seen a jailbreak like this for iOS. In fact, jailbreakme.com was used in August 2010 to do exactly the same thing, again with a PDF file. We didn't see any malicious use of this attack despite the source code being made available, but will it be different this time? It wouldn't be hard for a malicious attacker to reverse engineer how the jailbreak works and create something similar that doesn't require the user to click on "Free" -> "Install" and silently installs malicious code on your iOS device, either through the browser or via an email attachment. If this were created, an attacker could gain full control of your device and install everything from a keylogger to a full-blown bot. Or what about forwarding all mails to a third-party email address? The regular iOS sandbox won't be protecting your device, and since iOS is a variant of Unix, anything is possible.

 

We hope that Apple will release an updated firmware to fix this vulnerability and not wait for iOS5 to fix it. On a side note, I made a bet with @mikkohypponen on how long it will take Apple to release the patch. My guess is less than 10 days, Mikko thinks in 5 days. What do our readers think, how long will it take Apple to release the patch?

Filed under: ,

Patrik Runald

©2013 Websense, Inc. All Rights Reserved.